This is staggering. I am closely watching everything that happens that is not released to the public, however, I do have many friends who look for this information too because there’s just too much out there. The bit that gets me is that the government doesn’t exactly hide it from you, they put it where anyone can find it, but no one looks.
That’s where we come in, and we spread this information to you, but often it’s called misinformation. But this is NOT misinformation, it’s government data on their website and you can check it yourself. But many just ignore it and don’t check and continue to ignore what is really happening.
We have a compiled video on the data for you that is graphed and simple to follow. And like I said you can check this yourself.
This information was given to me by “Richard Peters” a really good and trusted friend. I have checked the data and it’s correct.
The amount of information we get is overwhelming, and I could not possibly write up about everything, so I have to pick what I think is most important.
Since the booster, the government have declared previously unknown conditions, for example, 100,000 people in the UK will die within 5 years from a rare heart condition that no one knows they have. Think about that for a moment. How could they possibly know that 100,000 people have a condition that the people don’t know they have? HIV, a major HIV outbreak for heterosexuals, but now even if you don’t have sex??? Can anyone explain that? And that 90% of covid patients are fully vaccinated. Over 400 professional athletes have died on the field so far. 300% rise in myocarditis in young adults and 1000% increase in thrombosis.
There are over 1.2 million serious adverse reactions to the vaccines and over 1,900 deaths directly as a result of the vaccines. But only 1% are reported to the yellow card. Ever heard of the yellow card? Google it, it’s an official body that every medical doctor must report vaccine injury or death to.
The thing is that we all want to fit in with everyone else. But if you all used the same energy standing up for your lives and the lives of your children and grandchildren as you use trying to debunk so-called conspiracy theories, we would have stopped these globalists two years ago.
I want you to watch this video on the efficacy of the vaccines below. It will completely shock you because you probably have not heard these true figures.
Look at my other posts for more information you need to know.
3 cases have already been identified in the UK. Viral hemorrhagic (hem-uh-RAJ-ik) fevers are infectious diseases that can cause severe, life-threatening illness. They can damage the walls of tiny blood vessels, making them leak, and can hamper the blood’s ability to clot. The resulting internal bleeding is usually not life-threatening, but the diseases can be.
Ebola vs. Hemorrhagic Fever: What’s the Difference?
Collectively known as viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHFs), these illnesses typically cause fever as well as extreme dysfunction in the body’s network of blood vessels, which can result in profuse bleeding.
The hemorrhaging associated with VHFs can arise from a number of different factors depending on which virus a person is infected with, said Alan Schmaljohn, a virologist and professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Maryland School of Medicine.
In the case of people with Ebola, hemorrhaging occurs when the virus infects the liver, affecting the body’s ability to make blood-clotting proteins and causing blood vessels to leak. But other viruses may cause hemorrhaging by depleting the body’s supply of platelets, which stop bleeding, Schmaljohn told Live Science. [5 Things You Should Know About Ebola]
Dr. Li-Meng Yan till now was ostracized and there were attempts to debunk her claims for over two years. Invariably, they turned out to be accurate. Now she comes out with another claim which is quite scary.
“The powers-that-be have attempted to debunk her claims for over two years. Invariably, they turn out to be accurate. This latest bombshell is the most concerning yet.” – JD Rucker
Below is a 24-minute video of Dr Li-meng Yan explaining everything. And there have already been 3 cases in the UK which again is blamed on West Africa, but for the last two years we have known this is coming from the CCP.
After doing over 350 interviews in my career, I rarely get shaken by a guest. That rare event occurred today when I interviewed Dr. Li-Meng Yan. She told me things from her various sources, many of which are in China with direct knowledge, that blew my mind. Is the CCP ( Chinese Communist Party ) developing another bioweapon? The answer to that is almost certainly yes, but Dr. Yan went a step further. She explained that they are already unleashing one onto the world through the Olympic games in Beijing today.
Before I get into the details, it’s important to understand that she and her sources are highly credible. There have been concerted efforts to discredit her, but her claims as far back as early 2020 have invariably been proven accurate. The powers-that-be attempted to debunk her claims that Covid-19 was developed in a lab. They tried to disprove what she’s said all along, that Peter Daszak and Anthony Fauci had intimate knowledge of the gain-of-function research that was going on in Wuhan. They even tried to prove she was wrong about the inefficacy of the vaccines. All of her claims have been verified and she has been vindicated multiple times.
Her Bio
She is a PhD virologist, medical doctor, immunologist and independent coronavirus expert. She was educated at two top medical schools in China, Southern Medical University and Central South University. She was also Post-doctoral Fellow in the School of Public Health at the University of Hong Kong (HKU). Because of her extensive professional network and scientific evidence, Dr. Yan has the distinction of being the only Chinese insider in the west with firsthand knowledge about the true nature of the virus as well as the Communist Chinese Party’s deceptive methods used to disguise their international bioweapons research.
Her revelations since January 19, 2020 have forced the CCP to change its strategy on the origin of SARS2 and saved many lives as a result.
Since escaping from Hong Kong on April 28, 2020, she has been interviewed four times by the FBI, including an FBI virologist, and each time she has been deemed credible. Dr. Yan had spent five years researching influenza vaccines when, in January, 2020, she was asked to investigate the ‘Wuhan Pneumonia’ that was sweeping that city. With that she became one of the first scientists outside the Wuhan Institute of Virology to analyze SARS-CoV-2. From her WHO H5 Reference Lab at HKU, she determined conclusively that the virus was engineered in the lab to be an unrestricted bioweapon. She also determined through her investigation that the spread of the virus in Wuhan was not the result of a “lab leak.”
Recognizing the great danger posed by the virus and the CCP plot to cover up its nefarious activities, Dr. Yan fled to the United States to reveal the truth to the world. Since coming to America, Dr. Yan has been the primary author of three research reports detailing the lab origins of SARS-CoV-2. Her other accomplishments include a patent-pending universal influenza vaccine as well as highly recommended articles on SARS-CoV-2 in Nature and The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Dr. Yan has attracted worldwide media attention, being interviewed by major news outlets in India, Spain, Japan, Italy and across Asia. Examples include: The Washington Post, FOX NEWS, NEWSMAX, The John Bachelor Show, The Daily Mail, Tucker Carlson Today, Tucker Carlson Tonight, Newsweek, New York Post and ITV in the UK.
Her Bombshell
The first couple of segments of our interview detailed the ways the Chinese Communist Party and other bad actors have used Covid-19 as a bioweapon. These are claims that she has detailed before, but she went into aspects of the story that were extremely compelling, including the fact that the CCP has used everyone, including her husband, to try to bring her out of hiding and take her back to China.
But it was near the middle of the interview that she blew my mind. According to Dr. Yan, CCP studied different hemorrhagic fever viruses including Lassa, Marburg, hantavirus, which all share the same drug target CD38 in the disease. Her sources show that the CCP is fully prepared to release such bioweapon viruses during the Winter Olympic. She cannot confirm what virus it is without having the viral genome.
This new disease may be a form of viral Hemorrhagic Fever that has a much higher fatality rate than Covid-19. According to Dr. Yan, cases of the disease may have been seen throughout China and just this week it popped up in the United Kingdom.
Health authorities said they have diagnosed two cases of a viral hemorrhagic fever in Britain, and possibly a third — marking the first time the illness has been seen in the country in over a decade.
Officials said the cases of Lassa fever involve members of the same family and are linked to recent travel to western Africa, where the illness is endemic. Two of the cases are conclusive and the third hasn’t been confirmed yet. Lassa fever is an acute viral hemorrhagic illness and infection usually occurs through food or household items contaminated with urine or feces from rats who are carrying the virus.
Symptoms of Lassa fever include fever and fatigue — and in more severe cases, bleeding in the mouth, trouble breathing and low blood pressure. Most people who contract Lassa fever don’t develop any symptoms and it’s fatal in only about 1% of cases. The new cases are the first in Britain since 2009.
The problem with this report is that the disease may not be standard Lassa fever, but possibly something new that was created through gain-of-function research. Dr. Yan has not confirmed this, but based on sources and evidence, Lassa is one of the bioweapons they prepared to launch attacks during or after Winter Olympics.
She noted that CCP military scientists worked with Liberia to study Ebola in 2014. They also sent six groups of scientists to Sierra Leone to study Lassa viruses, most recently in 2020. The west Africa studies by the CCP can help people understand their military-civil fusion and bioweapon program.
If she is correct, and all of her predictions have been proven accurate so far, this could mark the beginning of very troubling times in the world. Covid-19, while dangerous to the elderly with the earlier variants, seems to be rapidly fading. Governments around the world are lifting restrictions (though some, such as Canada, France, Australia, and the United States, continue to head in the other direction). It seems like the perfect time for the CCP, with the Olympics in Beijing, to spread a new bioweapon.
According to Dr. Yan, there is already a cure and the CCP is in the process of procuring as much of it as possible. It is a Johnson & Johnson drug called Darzalex (daratumumab). According to Cancer.org, the drug is currently used to treat multiple myeloma, but Dr. Yan said the CCP discovered it is effective against their new bioweapon as well.
Stay frosty, folks. The CCP has their sights set on world domination. Unleashing a dangerous disease and cornering the market on the cure may be their fast path to achieving their goals.
If you’re severely disabled as a result of a vaccination against certain diseases, you could get a one-off tax-free payment of £120,000. This is called a Vaccine Damage Payment.
You can also apply for this payment on behalf of someone who has died after becoming severely disabled because of certain vaccinations. You need to be managing their estate to apply.
Effect on benefits you receive
A Vaccine Damage Payment can affect benefits and entitlements like:
The effect the payment will have depends on a number of things. This includes the payment being put into a trust and the payments being made from it.
If you get a Vaccine Damage Payment, tell the office that deals with your benefit or tax credit claim. You can get contact details from letters they have sent you.
If you’re not, you ought to be. The Government have published a proposal on how they want to reform the Human Rights Act into a Bill of Rights.
WHATS THE PROBLEM WITH THAT?
Well as you can see in the infographic above there are a number of key concerns. Each one is a problem on their own but combined it makes for pretty chilling reading.
OK, WHAT CAN I DO ABOUT IT?
The Government are running a consultation at the moment to garner responses to their document.
Save Our Rights UK has created a guide on responding to the consultation which you can find here – saveourrights.uk/human-rights-act-consultation
It takes less than 5 minutes to complete and then please share this post to raise awareness.
DON’T LEAVE IT TOO LATE TO TAKE A STAND FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
You may think it won’t affect you, but you will be very wrong. This is a way to dictatorship. All they have to do is say something is for the greater good and there will be nothing we can do about it. They will make out it’s for misinformation, forcing vaccines and punishment for people asking questions. But what happens when that finishes? Imagine if you had your pension stopped because they wanted to because it’s money needed for the greater good? You will have no human rights to take them to court because they will tell the judges what cases to take on.
Your wages could be reduced to under minimum wage, benefits stopped and sacked for no reason. But you have no human rights against rich companies so forget your good life as you enter poverty.
Please don’t let them take away my children freedom and grand child’s freedom?
This video ( link above ) which was banned tonight on the 27th January 2022 details the systematic destruction of the NHS by the UK Government following the agenda as set out by Bill Gates. In this video I take you through evidence from Government documents to prove why the lockdowns happened, why you couldn’t attend a hospital or couldn’t get an appointment with your G.P.
A new NHS has been created called NHSX and its a private online healthcare system which is rolling out now across the UK. Once this has happend it will be rolled out across the world as the UK being the new centre of MEDTECH according to the British Government.
So warn your friends and family and make sure this video is shared all over the world, educate yourself now into what Covid-19 has all been about and prepare for the NHS to be built back better. This is it, the truth is here!
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT REFORM CONSULTATION – HAVE YOUR SAY (DEADLINE 8th March) 📣
Call me cynical, but these extracts from the consultation document make me nervous. Are they trying to legislate for a communitarian state? Read the proposals for yourself and have your say… 😱
⚠️“…our system must strike the proper balance of rights and responsibilities, individual liberty and the public interest, 🤔 rigorous judicial interpretation, and respect for the authority of elected law-makers… 😬
⚠️“The Bill of Rights will make sure a proper balance is struck between individuals’ rights, personal responsibility, and the wider public interest… 🧐
⚠️“The Bill of Rights… will reverse the mission creep that has meant human rights law being used for more and more purposes, and often with little regard for the rights of wider society…” 😳
⚠️DON’T let their Bill of Rights take YOUR rights away.
⚠️Putting the “greater good” above YOUR bodily integrity sets the scene for government mandated medical intervention (vaccines 💉 masks 😷 testing and MORE).
‼️ We need to OUTLAW Medical Mandates, so that individual bodily integrity trumps the so-called “greater good” EVERY TIME. 💪🏽
❤️🩹Would you not agree that the “the rights of wider society” DEPEND on the rights of EACH INDIVIDUAL being upheld? Without individuals, there IS no society!!! 🔥🔥🔥
Consultation description
The government is committed to updating the Human Rights Act 1998. This consultation seeks views on the government’s proposals to revise the Human Rights Act and replace it with a Bill of Rights, in order to restore a proper balance between the rights of individuals, personal responsibility and the wider public interest.
Chapters 1 and 2 provide a background of the domestic and international human rights context. Chapter 3 explores issues that have emerged with how the Human Rights Act 1998 operates in practice and outlines the case for reform. Chapter 4 sets out the government’s proposed reforms and their rationale in detail.
Each proposal is accompanied by specific consultation questions. We welcome responses on those questions. Submissions which do not focus on the questions but deal with the subject of the Human Rights Act more generally are also welcome.
To help us take full account of all potential impacts, including equality impacts, we shall complete a full Impact Assessment as necessary, once we have considered the responses to the consultation. We welcome responses from consultees on these proposals with regard to the potential impacts.
You will find the consultation document, along with a Welsh summary and full Welsh version below.
We will publish an easy read version in due course.
Oxford, the authors of the British clinical trial Recovery attempt to hide deaths by overdose
ANALYSIS: The authors of the recovery clinical trial (Peter Horby and Martin Landray) attempt to cover up a despicable fault in the hydroxychloroquine arm. Several elements are concerning : results that are hiding reality, unforgivable errors in the documents, the author of the appendix of the documents of the Recovery study (British clinical trial) is Dr Hayden known to be historically close to Gilead having taken on several occasions the defence of Remdesivir (drug that has recently been approved by the European Medicines Agency without evidence of therapeutic benefit and very harmful side effects). Hence the Recovery study cannot be considered serious.
Retrospective foreword
We note that there is mounting evidence that hydroxychloroquine is active and tolerable against Covid-19.
Before exposing the intellectual fallacy and the real deadly implications of the results of Recovery which conclude that hydroxychloroquine is ineffective, we seek to expose the reader to the comprehensive analytical work carried out by FranceSoir in search for truth. In particular, we have revealed problems of medical ethics (1)and notorious incompetence (2), and even potentially criminal activities (3, 4), related to the Recovery trial, on which we have published a complete document demonstrating the existence of obvious conflicts of interest (5).
France Soir, with the help of scientists and clinical trial experts, has carried out a rigorous and meticulous analysis of the majority of studies published or submitted for pre-publication on the MedRxiv site of Cornell University. FranceSoir is the only print media to have scientifically dismantled, point by point, the highly questionable prepublications, whose conclusions were biased against hydroxychloroquine or in flagrant contradiction with the data exposed, as for the AP-HP study (6) or Epiphare (7). On the other hand, it is clear from other studies and clinical trials that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), in combination with azithromycin which gives it considerable synergy, appears to be the only tolerable and active treatment against Covid-19 (8,9,10,11) and also suitable for prophylaxis (9).
We also bring to bear that the current pandemic has allowed members of the public, concerned about the health of their loved ones and themselves, to perceive the extent to which misinformation could circulate in the mainstream media. This led is evidence by the fact that only 7% of the French have confidence in what the messages broadcasted by television media about the pandemic (9).
“With a self-awarded white knight role, the media are no longer content to give a voice to one side or the other by commenting, in a quest for impartiality, but are setting themselves up as true referees of what is or is not scientific and medical truth.
In this respect, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has been systematically denigrated as a target. Why has it been systematically denigrated? It was put in their heads that the randomized controlled clinical trial was the universal panacea of the reasoned medical scientific approach. This is particularly false in this case and in opposition to the medical ethics of the Hippocratic Oath (1),” says a medical research specialist.
However, this certainty, instilled by intense brainwashing by public health authorities and Big Pharma-funded television presenters, is crumbling and vacillating in the face of accumulated evidence (8,9,10,11) in favour of hydroxychloroquine and raises questions about how a molecule such as remesivir could have slipped through the cracks of the European Medicines Agency without toxicity testing.
What else can we say about the statement made by the French President on July 14th, in response to a question from a television journalist who asked him, if he would take hydroxychloroquine in the event of Covid-19 contamination?
“From what I understand about science, there is no such thing as a stabilized treatment. France is the country of “Lumière” and I believe in rationality … If there is no treatment, I’m not going to take it,” he said.
He added: “It is not for the President of the Republic or a politician to decide a scientific debate.”
But that is exactly what he just did live on the air!
And then speaking about Professor Raoult:
“Nor is it for a man of science, even if he becomes a public figure, to act on scientific beliefs.”
Is the President suggesting that Pr Raoult doesn’t act as a man of science, but on the basis of scientific belief? Would we have come to the apotheosis of denigrating a man whose entire career speaks for him? Is our President so unsecure, that he cannot help but say, that perhaps in a few months’ time we will learn that hydroxychloroquine is a really active treatment? When we have obviously known this for quite some time. These statements reveal how little our President cares about the possibility that this treatment could have saved lives.
The conditions surrounding Recovery (boundary conditions) give us an indepth
We believe the principal investigators of the Recovery trial are attempting to conceal the results of the very dangerous, even fatal, overdose of the hydroxychloroquine arm. The authors of the trial came very close to pre-publishing significant results demonstrating the harmful nature of HCQ!
First of all, it should be remembered that this is not a real publication, but a text filed on the MedRxiv site of Cornell University and that it was therefore not submitted to the proofreading and critical questions of other researchers in the clinical field. But never mind. The article still subtly suggests an adverse effect by presenting a survival curve showing a 2% increase in mortality at 28 days (from 25 to 26.8%) in the HCQ arm compared to standard care. This curve is presented with a Y-axis not going to 100% which exaggerates the 2% increase. This difference is not significant according to the value of the calculated statistical power p = 0.18.
We are here in very subtle communication effects which consist in hiding the reality one does not want to talk about. We demonstrated this phenomenon in the phase III study of remdesivir (Veklury®) published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) where the results of the secondary endpoint of 28-day mortality were deliberately masked.
We state that if HCQ had been used at an acceptable dose level on the first day and on subsequent days a beneficial effect could have been measured. This effect is masked by the premature death or the premature transfer to ICU of hospitalized patients overdosed with HCQ within 48 hours of initiation of treatment. We remind the reader that patients received a cumulative dose of 3.2 g of HCQ in 48 hours, including 2.4 g on the first day, which represents a potentially fatal overdose on patients in this category (4). It should also be remembered that HCQ overdose is characterized by acute respiratory failure (4) which a priori cannot be distinguished from the respiratory symptoms due to Covid-19. On the other hand, only heart failure can be demonstrated (prolongation of the QT interval and twisting of the electrocardiogram peaks).
We also asked in a previous article if, in the Recovery trial, hydroxychloroquine had not killed as many patients as it had saved?
Is it possible that the beneficial effect of a treatment may be masked by a harmful effect such as overdose, comedication or an increased risk factor for certain categories of patients?
We have already recently highlighted such a problem of masking the beneficial effect of HCQ by contradictory effects in our careful reverse engineering analysis of the EPIPHARE study (7). EPIPHARE sought to determine whether HCQ conferred protection from Covid-19-related hospitalization and mortality in patients receiving long-term treatment for chronic inflammatory conditions (lupus and rheumatoid arthritis). The authors concluded that HCQ does not confer protection on these autoimmune patients, who are a priori more likely to develop viral infections than the rest of the population. We showed that the authors of this study were withholding data that they had available and that could have led to the opposite conclusion of a protective effect of HCQ. A Chinese study published in the Lancet on July 3 confirms this. In the Chinese study, patients with rheumatoid arthritis taking hydroxychloroquine had a 91% reduced risk of infection with the COVID-19 virus (with a statistically significant power p = 0.044) compared to those with the same chronic inflammatory diseases, but not on long-term HCQ treatment.
To continue with the results here are some of what the author states
Results: 1561 patients randomly assigned to receive hydroxychloroquine were compared to 3155 patients simultaneously assigned to usual care. Overall, 418 (26.8%) patients assigned to hydroxychloroquine and 788 (25.0%) patients assigned to usual care died within 28 days (ratio 1.09 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96 to 1.23 P=0.18). Consistent results were seen in all pre-specified patient subgroups.
Patients assigned to hydroxychloroquine were less likely to be discharged alive from hospital within 28 days (60.3% vs. 62.8% rate ratio 0.92 95% CI 0.85-0.99 p missing) and those not on invasive mechanical ventilation at baseline were more likely to achieve the composite endpoint of invasive mechanical ventilation or death (29.8% vs. 26.5% risk ratio 1.12; 95% CI 1.01-1.25 p missing). There was no excess of new major cardiac arrhythmias.
How with 5000 patients we get such a high p for mortality when we are told; the advantage and necessity of the randomized trial is to have a very small “p”. The advantage and necessity of the randomized trial is to have a very small “p”. 500 patients per group would suffice. It is mathematical.
Why is the “p”not given for the 2 other tests when on these 2 measures the authors conclude a significant difference?
Our clinical trial expert tells us:
“In fact, the general question is, what went wrong with the data that made such a large trial yield no significant result?”
One gets the impression that the “results are deliberately insignificant” in order to hide a disturbing reality.
To finish off, the icing on the cake: the author of the appendix to Recovery is none other than Frederic Hayden, a doctor historically close to Gilead.
The author of the document is not one of the members of Recovery, but Frederic Hayden of the University of Virginia. One could almost believe that the Recovery team no longer wants to write the results of the study and is subcontracting it to another university. We had already mentioned this professor in a previous paper that was used primarily to get a valid clinical trial number in the United States. This same professor is a strong advocate of Gilead’s recovery being quoted as saying of this drug that “this is the first convincing evidence that an antiviral drug can really benefit Covid-19 patients, especially patients hospitalized with Covid-19”.
He participated in the Chinese remdesivir study and is quoted in Fortune.com as having defended the remdesivir study. He is also known to have been close to Gilead since the HIV.
Finally he was one of the key investigators on Gilead’s Tamiflu.
As in a bad movie, Gilead will have pushed its remdesivir, authorized by Europe without the slightest toxicity study, but it will have gone a long way to disqualify its effective, inexpensive, innocuous competitor, hydroxychloroquine. This battle with unequal weapons does not serve the interest of public health but benefits the mastodons of the pharmaceutical industry, prepared to anything. The story of recovery is not over and we would not be surprised to see a mixture of dexamethasone and remdesivir point its nose shortly as a potential combination of drugs. The marketing techniques already used by Gilead are repeating themselves.
The Truth Hurts News Share blog 