Just In: Criminal Complaint Filed In The Office Of The Texas Attorney General Alleges Murder and Crimes Against Humanity

A complaint has been filed in the United States of America on the 17th January 2022, at the Office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. the chief legal officer of the U.S. state of Texas against individuals who are accused of being complicit in murder and crimes against humanity.

The complainant is a resident of Harris County Texas, Jack Boteler who is representing all interested parties who received the Emergency Use Authorization “investigational injection of genetic biologic material (mRNA or adenoviral DNA) coding for the Wuhan spike protein”

The complaint has extensive, detailed evidence to show that the accused jointly planned and executed the development and release of a biowarfare toxin with the dual objectives of global depopulation, and population control.

Their aim according to the complaint, is to ultimately lead to a one-world government by inducing panic, economic hardship, terror, death, and injury to global populations.

Who Are “They”?

Many of us throughout this two-year period refer to the people that orchestrated the greatest hoax known to man, as “they”. For example. “They” have created a “pandemic” as a trojan horse in order to usher in a New World Order.  Or, “they” are violating our human rights, etc, but who exactly are “they”?

Boteler knows exactly who “they” are and has named names and while the majority of them are the usual suspects, and often cited as the perpetrators, there are a few names here that do not get enough exposure.

While they enjoy their relative anonymity, they are able to continue aiding with the alleged offences with little disruption to their lives. For this reason, the long list of names of the “they” in this complaint are named here, for which I make no apology.

They are:

Any and all officers and/or directors of the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (“HHS”) and affiliates
Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
National Institutes of Health (“NIH*),
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”),
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC”), Center for Medicare and
Medicaid Services (CMS)
Dr. Ralph Baric and the Board of Regents at the University of North
Carolina Chappell Hill.
Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus of the World Health
Organization (“WHO”).
Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Dr. Francis Collins.
Dr. Rick Bright.
Dr. Janet Woodcock.
Dr. Peter Daszak:
Mr. William Gates Junior.
Mr. Theodore (“Ted™) Tumer.
Mr. Eli Broad
Mr. George Soros.
Dr. Deborah Birx.
Mr. Richard A. Rothschild.
Any Director or Officer of Moderna Inc
Any Director or Officer of Pfizer, Inc.
Any Director or Officer of Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Any Director or Officer of Astra Zeneca PIc
Any Director or Officer of the Pirbright Institute
Any Director or Officer of John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Any Director or Officer of the World Economic Forum.
Any Director or Officer of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Any Director or Officer of the World Bank
Any Director or Officer of the International Monetary Fund (“IMF)

Although an already sizable list of defendants, Boteler also includes any other person, governmental, or non-governmental organization, incorporated or not, including both U.S. and international media who knowingly aided and abetted the denial or restriction of access to therapeutic treatments for the Sars-CoV-2 virus and/or promoted or distributed Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) experimental gene therapy injections (Covid 19 Vaccines).

Psychological Warfare

The complaint alleges that the above perpetrator’s employed psychological warfare mechanisms, which include, media reports, public policy, coercion, deceit, mandates, bribes, travel restrictions, employment restrictions, free speech restrictions, liberty restrictions, and other tactics.

These mechanisms were used to induce the global population into receiving the pre-planned experimental gene therapy, an accusation which is supported by data and evidence which, although already vast is said to be only a small fraction of demonstrable, evidentiary material.

Factual Allegations 

Much of this evidence is cited within a 30-page document which shows the international events that have occurred over many years which have contributed to the crimes.

Here is just a taster of just some of the events and the individuals involved which are cited in the complaint as factual allegations which include virus origins, vaccine development, and promotion, hospitalisations, and censored therapeutics and physician prerogatives.

Or take a look at the complaint here


Boteler has provided evidence that Fauci took steps as far back as 1986 to create a human dependency on vaccines by lobbying for legislation to relieve the pharmaceutical companies of liability through emergency use authorisation (source).

In 1998 Fauci went on to fund research at the University of North Carolina Chappell Hill (UNC) following Dr. Ralph Baric’s clone of the Corona Virus and amplifying the pathogenic “Spike’ Protein. A year later, in 1999 the Coronavirus was engineered as a bioweapon paid for by Fauci through NIAID. and later patented by UNC as the Sars Corona Virus in 2002 – a full year before anyone ever heard the name, Sars. (source) (Source) (source).

Between January 2014 and December 2020, Fauci, along with other named and unnamed Defendants, provided samples of biowarfare agents and funding to the Wuhan level 4 biolab for the purpose of continuing “gain-of-function” research. Fauci later told congress under oath that the purpose was not gain-of-function, evidence would later prove he lied (source) (source) (source). 

Particularly notable is that in 2017 Fauci warned President Trump that he would be “having to deal with a major, global pandemic during his first term in office” video below


Bill Gates is well known for his involvement in all things “COVID” related, however, not so well known is the fact he convened a meeting around March 2013, which included Fauci, Eli Broad, Theodore (Ted) Turner, Warren Buffet, Oprah Winfrey, George Soros, William Gates Jr., and other Defendants.

The meeting which was held in New York although framed in less “sinister” terms according to the complaint, was for the purpose of planning a mass reduction of the World’s population, as evidenced in part by the presence of Dr. Fauci, the only non-billionaire believed there present. (source) (source) (source) (Source).

On the 17th February 2017, Gates predicted a world-wide pandemic at the 53 Munich Security Conference stating, “Bioterrorism has become feasible enough that a genetic engineer could use computers to create a synthetic airborne pathogen capable of wiping out a fraction of the world’s population quickly.

“The next epidemic could originate on the computer screen of a terrorist intent on using genetic engineering to create a synthetic version of the smallpox virus, or a super contagious and deadly strain of the flu” (source).


On the 9th November 2015, Defendant Ralph Baric,from the department of microbiology and immunology of UNC published A SARS-like Cluster of Circulating Bat Coronaviruses Shows Potential for Human Emergence,resulting from his research to create a virulent disease with manufactured “gain-of function”

The report which was directed and sent Fauci, stated: “Having established that the SHC014 spike has the ability to mediate infection of human cells and cause disease in mice, we next synthesized a full-length SHC014-CoV infectious clone based on the approach used for SARS-CoV.”

Baric also states: “to examine the emergence potential (that is, the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs, we built a chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV spike protein {. . . ] we characterized CoV infection mediated by the SHC014 spike protein in primary human airway cells and in vivo and conclude these results confirm that the DIV vaccine would not be protective against infection with SHC014 and could possibly augment disease in the aged‐vaccinated group.”(source).

Peter Daszak has been a relative lesser-known name in comparison to Fauci, Gates, and Rockefeller, yet appears to be very instrumental in the planning of the “Pandemic”

In 2015, Dr. Peter Daszak, who was then CEO of EcoHealth Alliance, in an address to the National Academy of Science, spoke on the need to promote a major pandemic, saying that “until an infectious disease crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold it is often ignored.

“To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, he said, we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCM’s such as a pan‐influenza or pan‐coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics follows the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process”.(source).


David Rockefeller seems to be someone who had akways been very open about his plans for the global population, I guess it is true what they say, that the best place to hide is in the open, as although quoted many times for years, his statements never seemed to be taken seriously.

Rockefeller is cited in the complaint from 1984 where he is said to have opined on the need to end self-rule government (source) A decade later, he was still touting the benefits of a one-world government and population control which was quoted from his address at the U.N. General Assembly three years later,

We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and other publications whose directors have attended our
meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty
years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for
the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity
during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and
prepared to march toward a world government. .
supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is
surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past
centuries. (source)

In May 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation and Global Business Network published Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, which outlines a scenario whereby World powers utilize a global pandemic, naturally occurring or man-made, that presents an opportunity to technocratically control humanity and reduce the size of the global population.

LOCK STEP Scenario, Narratives, depicted a world of tighter top‐down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback (page 18). This publication provided the framework and methodology for the planning and preparation of a planned biowarfare attack on the global population according to Boteler (source)(source).

More Pre-Planning Evidence

Rockefeller was not alone in the preparations for the future “virus” or Trojan horse aiding the acceptance of the NWO. T he complaint has also evidenced that the COVID “Pandemic” was pre-planned through:

  • A 2019, WHO publication a “Worldwide Exercise in the Release of Respiratory Pathogens”, to facilitate a worldwide acceptance of a vaccine (source).
  • An Executive Order in September 2019 for a “Warp Speed” development of a vaccine, Fauci later told congress (Dec 2019), that the President’s E.O. had authorised the mRNA vaccine development.
  • October 2019, Gates, Fauci, Brix, the NIH, CDC and WHO, and associated conspirators planned, orchestrated and conducted Event 201 a practice run of their global response to their criminal enterprise (Source)
  • September 2015,  Richard Rothschild & the Pirbright Institute developed and patented the “Covid 19” Polymerase Chain Reaction (“PCR”) test kit, four and a half years before the discovery of the Novel Corona Virus (Source)
  • January 2018, the World Bank, affiliated financing subsidiaries and associated entities, including  the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”), financed the purchase of Covid 19 Polymerase Chain Reaction (“PCR”) Test kits for more than 50 countries world-wide.

Factual Allegations – Vaccinations

Additional evidence to suggest the whole event has been preplanned was also shown regarding vaccines. For example, October 2016, Defendant National Institutes of Health, and other parties, filed for US Patent WO/2018/081318 to create an injectable compound to cause the recipient to produce prefusion coronavirus Spike proteins.

This injectable is known as the “Moderna Covid 19 Vaccine”. A recently disclosed 2015, heretofore ‘Confidential’ Agreement between the NIAID and Moderna, show that the two jointly owned the vaccine when at the same time sharing the dataset with UNC’s Dr Ralph Baric.(source)

Boteler has also gathered further information regarding how defendants “named and unnamed” but including the CDC, WHO. NIH, fraudulently fraudulently coerced, mandated, tricked and conducted a criminal scheme to increase the fear and terror
among the global population by economically rewarding hospitals, physicians, governments, ministries and health service providers with pecuniary rewards up to US $400,000 per case for diagnosing substantially all sickness, morbidity and fatalities as being caused by Covid 19 (Source)

The vaccines were then hailed as being the answer to those fatalities, yet as of January 2, 2022, the VAERS weekly “Red Box” Report VAERS reached the “unprecedented milestone” of 1,000,227 injuries following coronavirus vaccines. In the 31-year history of VAERS, there are 9,248 reports of fatalities following all other vaccines.

Also, since the start of the coronavirus vaccine campaign there have been 21,002 reports of death following coronavirus vaccines. 

It is noted, too, that after approximately 26 reported deaths the Swine Flu Vaccine was stopped. (Source)

The Boteler case, as far as we can see, has it all, and has cited the evidence to support his allegations. We wish him all the very best of luck with his case and thank him for bringing these crimes against humanity to the justice system.

Please if interested read the whole case here


Session 88 Breathing down their necks. The Corona investigative committee.

This is session 88 of the CIC which have an international criminal court case in the Hague against many high-class figures in governments and corporations around the world.

There is the risk of violence towards unvaccinated people. You must watch this video and look at what they want to do to unvaccinated.

I can see widespread violence around the world at this rate, which is what they want.

But the corona investigative committee are breathing down their neck.

Detection of the spike protein causing damage has been proved

Please watch the video on the link below


Dr Mike Yeadon’s key testimony — Part I: The Eight Covid Lies

Image from GloriaTv

This is the first instalment of a five-webpage transcript of Dr Mike Yeadon’s testimony to the 86th session of Stiftung Corona Ausschuss, held on 7 January 2022.
In this transcript, covering the first twenty minutes of his testimony, Dr Yeadon establishes his credentials and rebuts critics of his motives.


I’m Dr Mike Yeadon. I describe myself as an industry veteran. I worked in the biopharmaceutical industry for all of my life.

My first degree was biochemistry and toxicology. English people don’t like to brag, but I’m told I should. I was top of the year by a very long way.

As an undergraduate, I worked under military clearance at Porton Down: that’s the equivalent of Fort Detrick. It’s where the UK military develops its so-called chemical defences. So I was under the Official Secrets Act—they must have thought I wasn’t a crazy person at the time.

I also worked for six months at the Police Forensic Service headquarters at Aldermaston, so i learned a lot of analytical techniques in that time. 

Then I did a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology, and after that I jumped into industry. I had seven years, seven happy years, at the Wellcome Research Labs, before they closed after being acquired by Glaxo. So my my career spanned the consolidation phase of pharmaceutical companies—we call it the “dirty snowball”. Companies became absolutely huge, and that’s relevant to what’s happening today: they are so large, so powerful.

After that, I went to Pfizer in the UK, at their very famous Sandwich, Kent, research base. I think more blockbuster drugs were discovered and released from that lab than any other single establishment on the planet. I wish I could claim I had anything to do with it, but I didn’t. But what [that job] did do is give me the opportunity to learn, as it were, at the knee of great drug discoveries. People [at that laboratory] actually conceived and led programmes, invented molecules, developed them, went through safety testing and launched them. And they all made more than a billion a year thereafter. So it was a really good place for learning this trade.

I left Pfizer in 2011, having been head of respiratory research worldwide. So I was the chief scientific officer for that therapy area, Allergy and Respiratory. I left because they closed the site in 2011. I played an important role, I think, in helping some of those programmes, and some staff, to move to new homes: the world’s second largest generics company, Mylan, acquired some space on that research park and hired many of my former colleagues. Obviously, I didn’t do the deal, but I had, I think, something to do with [the success of] pitching it to the company.

Over the next ten years to today, I’ve been a consultant to startup and mid-phase biotech companies. Some are now public, others privately held. That’s about thirty companies, mostly in the field of respiratory or inflammation, immunology, that kind of thing. In the middle of that ten-year period, I had the opportunity to start my own biotech company with three other colleagues, and to raise some money from private venture capital and so acquire some compounds from my former portfolio, because Pfizer was closing the site down and indeed shrinking its footprint. That was quite a common model ten years ago.

So that’s me: I have the broad biological discipline and understanding necessary for doing research—that’s understanding disease and mechanisms well enough to contemplate intervention points that could help slow down a disease or ameliorate symptoms. And to do so safely: that was always the number one watchword.


Some people have said, “Why are you speaking out?” and, “You’re a crazy person!”, or whatever. The three things, I would say, most commonly attributed to me which are not true, I will take them [in turn]:

– “He’s a bitter ex-employee.” — Well, you know, for one, I left ten years ago. I don’t hold a grudge, and certainly not for ten years. Secondly, Pfizer and I got on really well. I would say—to this day—that Pfizer was the best employer I ever worked for. It’s a fantastic place to work. For the reasons I described, something’s gone wrong since, obviously; but I was unhappy that I had to leave. They were very good to me.

I was one of the last employees off the site, because I was helping place people and projects. So that doesn’t sound like a bitter person. They also treated me very well in terms of redundancy, because I was a vice-president.

And then, as I’ve said, a year after leaving, I came back with money and a lawyer and did a deal with them, and then two years later they put additional capital in. That doesn’t sound like we’re getting on badly. And in 2017, when Novartis acquired Ziarco, my biotech, they made an undisclosed sum that I would say would make them very happy. They definitely did a good deal. That was five years ago, and I’ve had no interaction with them since. So no, I’m not bitter, and I was very lucky to make some money: that’s what has allowed me to be independent, by the way.

– Others have said I’m “seeking fame”. — Well, no. Despite the fact that I can appear on TV or on camera, I’m actually by nature quite a shy person. If you left me to my own devices, I’d be tinkering with motorbikes in a shed, probably. That’s what I like to do.

– And others say, “Well, he’s making money.” — No. There’s not a single thing I’ve ever done [in media appearances] that has been monetised, and indeed I probably lost hundreds of thousands of pounds being thrown off the scientific advisory boards of former clients [since speaking up about gene therapy injections], when they said, “You’ve become the story and it’s not acceptable,” which I understood.

So it’s costing me money; it’s hurting my reputation; and I had every reason just to stay at home and enjoy my early retirement. No, the reason I’m speaking out is because I noticed advisors to the UK Government lying: lying directly on television.

At first, it was just kind of fascinating, but through the spring and into the summer of 2020, I became first alarmed and then later in the year frightened—and I still remain frightened.


Why? Every [developed] country had [before Covid] what was called a pandemic preparedness plan for things like this, or influenza more typically, and I’ve read them. I’ve read all of them, maybe twenty, from the G20 countries, plus the WHO [pandemic preparedness plan]. And in essence, they have only two things to recommend:

1. If you are symptomatic, please stay home and away from other people until you’re better—and that’s because we’ve known for decades that symptomatic people drive respiratory viral infections, epidemics.

2. Wash your hands more frequently than usual—because with any new pathogen, we don’t understand transmission properly, so that’s a good precaution.

The next nine pages of these [pre-Covid] pandemic preparedness plans involved telling us what [countries] shouldn’t do. None of them involved: border closures, unless you lived on a small island; school closures; business closures; mass testing of the well; lockdown; masking; anything like that. None of them. Absolutely all of the things that we have been told are “essential” were missing and explicitly ruled out by the previous plans.

So I would say the strongest evidence I can offer for my assertion that there is a supranational plan to take over all of the liberal democracies is this that all of the countries had somewhat similar pandemic preparedness plans, that were very simple, and they all discarded them in the [same] weeks of March 2020All of them. And they replaced them with the same narrative script.


I’ll just describe [that script]: what I call them the the Eight Covid Lies. Every single one of them is an untruth. And I think the objective was to frighten people to death, and I think it’s worked.

So how could it possibly be that Germany, Italy, the United States, Iceland, Scandinavian countries, have all got the same bunch of wrong information, all at the same time? I put it to you, ladies and gentlemen of the audience, that there’s only one way that can happen: and that’s if they all agreed to do it beforehand, really.

I’m not going to take a lot of time on the Eight Covid Lies today, because there was a very long recording on The Highwire with Del Bigtree, about a year ago, where I go through them in painful detail. But, [in summary,] what did they say?

Covid measures as per global script, Chernivtsi, Ukraine, May 2020 (Wikimedia Commons)

Covid measures as per global script, Chernivtsi, Ukraine, May 2020 (Wikimedia Commons)

1. Well, they told us things like: “This is an extremely lethal virus. If you catch it, get ill, you really could die.” Remember the falling man, face down, in Wuhan? It’s never happened anywhere else. It’s pure theatre.

And it turns out that it’s not a particularly lethal virus, if it exists at all. It’s about the same as a bad seasonal influenza.

2. They used PCR testing repeatedly, off swabs up noses and throats, and led you to believe that these were highly accurate and able to distinguish a clinically infected person from someone that’s not.

And even the inventor [of PCR], Kary Mullis, who’s died, who won a Nobel prize for this technique, said you should never use it for this purpose. So I won’t waste any more time [on this topic], but they’re still using these damn tests, and they’re not reliable; they don’t tell you anything, really.

3. They also say you should wear masks, but masks have been extensively studied. Cloth masks, if anything, make you more likely to capture an unusual bacterial pneumonia, because you’re breathing through a filthy cloth. And the blue medical masks are not masks, actually: they’re splash guards.

Their purpose in hospitals is to stop blood and body fluids getting into the nose and mouth of the attending healthcare worker. They’ve never been for filtering your breath, and obviously they don’t do so, but they told you to wear masks, and I think the purpose—certainly in me—it causes anxiety. I feel really awful wearing these things.

4. Then, they introduced lockdowns, where you were all to stay at home mostly, unless you were a poor manual worker, and then you had to go out to work—but the intelligentsia pretty much got paid to stay at home for very long periods of time: three months initially, in the case of Britain.

Lockdowns, they told us, would slow the spread of transmission of this virus, and lots of people thought it must obviously be so, because it is a disease spread from person to person. But it didn’t chime with me, and I’m embarrassed to say it took me months to realise why lockdowns wouldn’t work.

5. And it comes to this next lie: the idea of asymptomatic transmission, that you could be bearing the virus in your airways yet have no symptoms, but nevertheless be able to spread enough of the stuff to infect a person nearby. That’s not true. That’s a flat lie.

Whenever a scientific advisor, medical advisor to a government, tells you things like like asymptomatic transmission, I want you to know that they’re not mistaken; they’re lying, because it’s been studied and it’s simply not true. I can supply a link which is an accumulation of statements by Fauci, a WHO doctor, and other people—actually, including me—that goes through this argument.

So if asymptomatic transformation doesn’t occur—and I am certain it’s epidemiologically irrelevant: I’m not saying it never occurs, but it’s irrelevant—if it’s irrelevant, why would you need to wear masks if you’re well? Why would you need to test somebody who’s not got symptoms? Why would you need to close your business or your school, or the economy?

So, again, they’ve lied to you, with the objective of both frightening you—and I think also, learning [this insight] from financially experienced people, the other objective was to begin to destroy the economy and the sovereign currencies, and I think that’s a continuing objective.

6. They also lied to us and told us that there were no treatments for this respiratory viral infection. I will take my hat off to Dr Peter McCullough as a leader, but he’s [merely] representative of very many brave physicians who pushed back on this nihilism. They have determined half a dozen really quite good therapies, used progressively: early on, you want to treat replication; in the middle phrase, inflammation; in the terminal phase, coagulation.

And if you understand this multi-phase infection, you come to the conclusion—which is mine—that this is the most treatable respiratory illness ever. It’s really quite surprising, but the the use of those treatments is denied almost all around the world, to the extent that people will be fined or even struck off as physicians. That’s another lie there.

7. Then they would say things like, “Well, we’re not sure, when you’ve had it, whether you’ve become immune.” I would say Immunology 101 tells you that that’s simply not true. We know that the default understanding would be: once you’ve shrugged off this virus, you will have taken high-resolution pictures of it, as it were, using your immune system, and if you see it again—or something related to it, like a variant—you will not get clinically ill; not for months, possibly many years. So that’s another lie.

8. And the final lie—and we’ll come back to this—is that the vaccines are safe and effective, but that’s a whole whole other story.

I’ve said that the evidence of a supranational plan is the discarding of simple well-established pandemic preparedness plans and replacing them with this bunch of lies, and all the countries did it.

If someone would like to write to me with an innocent explanation for this, I’d love to hear it. I want to be wrong, but unfortunately I don’t think I am.


So if the motive is fear, I think the ultimate aim is control. We will come on onto this: the control mechanism, that we can see being installed all around us, of the so-called vaccine passports: a certificate first, on paper, and eventually a QR code on your phone, that tells anyone who needs to know that you have received the requisite number of doses of these materials.

We’ll come back to this, but again, that’s nonsense. Economic destruction, I think, is on its way. There was a person who’s very experienced in the City of London, and I heard him phoning into a radio show three weeks ago, and he said, “I don’t know anything about viruses.”

He said a lot about finance and talked about the amount of money—it’s not even been borrowed, it’s just printed—this actually created new money with an IOU from the government: they have given certificates to investors. He said:

It is my view that sovereign currency is already destroyed, and the exchange rates ought to be moving violently against each other, and they’re not, if you go and look.

And that’s because, as Catherine Austin Fitts tells us, this is a conspiracy led by the central banking clique and their clients to take over the world. I think once they’ve done that, destroyed the economy—again, I’m paraphrasing from Catherine—there will be a great financial reset which will have us using our vax passes—a digital ID—and central bank digital currencies, CBDCs, which you can look up. They are real and they are being talked about by all central banks. You won’t like those; you really won’t. It’ll be the end of cash and of any privacy of any transaction.

And I know I go further than many, but I’m really quite concerned that there’s a serious intent to kill a very large proportion of the population of the world. Again, I hope I’m wrong, but all of the measures required to get to this point of control through vaccine passports—digital ID and also [the intent] to repeatedly vaccinate people: they certainly set the scene where a bad actor could introduce a gene sequence that will rob you of your health and kill you in a fairly predictable way at a fairly predictable rate per million doses. So if somebody does want to depopulate, the setup is so perfect that it isn’t completely crazy [to notice this].

Before I move on to the vaccines—and this is a concern—I’ve had lots of people who have said to me:

Mike, this cannot possibly be the way you describe it. It looks compelling, I understand, but come on: you can’t have a global conspiracy like this. It would leak, and it involves far too many people, you know. You must be wrong; there must be another explanation.

And I suggest to them that they look for a video—on YouTube surprisingly—by a German journalist called Paul Schreyer. It’s a one-hour documentary called Pandemic simulation games — Preparation for a new era?

And when you watch that, your last rickety defences that this isn’t a well-organised, long-planned event will, I think, disappear, and your heart will be in your boots by twenty minutes in. Basically, all of the actors that you see around the table—including in, say, Event 201, that took place at the end of 2019—all of those players are currently taking the roles they had in the simulations, and all around the world, and are doing exactly the things that they did in the simulation. So those were the rehearsals, and there were more than a dozen of these damn things.


And I think one of the bitterest moments for me was to realise that we were doing it to ourselves: that the US, UK, New Zealand, Australia and Canada—the Five Eyes—I think are the leading players. I’m not going to say Russia’s not involved or whatever, but it looks like the Edward Bernaysschool of psychological management has been used by the military intelligence people: they’ve directed their weapons at their own people for two years, through all these lies, repetitive messaging, so that what we want to do is to wake people up—because if we don’t wake up, we are finished as a set of liberal democracies.

I’m going to turn to the vaccines, but before I do that, I’ll say two things that are not original sayings but that strike me as very appropriate.

I’ve seen on many message boards: “When this all comes out, don’t ask me how I knew; ask yourself why you didn’t.” I mean, honestly, the the evidence that things are amiss, I think, is so stark that you literally have to avert your eyes not to realise that things are really bad everywhere.

And the other thing is an old saying—I’ve heard this before; it makes me chuckle a little bit:

If you’re one step ahead of everybody else, you can be seen as a genius; if you’re two steps ahead, you’re a lunatic.

And I’m afraid that’s what I’ve been: my job as a scientist was to spot faint patterns in sparse data—that’s what you do when you’re trying to work out something that’s new—and so I think I havebeen a couple of steps ahead, and probably sometimes wrong; but broadly, I think, it is, sadly, roughly what I’ve said.

Now, let’s get the slides up because a colleague’s done an analysis that I think is quite striking when you see it.